Wednesday, January 7, 2009

HUGE: Local Community Activists Kick Home Depot Out of Sunland-Tujunga

THIS IN FROM JOE B AND "NO HOME DEPOT"
THIS IS A HUGE-HUGE VICTORY FOR COMMUNITY ACTIVISM!
THEY TOOK BACK THEIR CITY!!!
 
Tuesday, January 6, 2008-

The Biggest Breaking News Ever!
VICTORY!
Home Depot pulling out of S-T!
We just spoke with a high ranking HD official
(at 10:45pm) and he confirmed!
We are literally shaking (and celebrating)!
More updates tomorrow as they come in!
Congratulations Sunland-Tujunga!
WOW!
Thank You Home Depot! You did the right thing!


LA Times covers the story
HERE!
Ron Kaye has the story HERE!
Street-Hassle has an optimistic mention HERE!
Mayor Sam has the Breaking News
HERE!
NBC has the story
HERE!
 

Monday, January 5, 2009

ELECTION '09: Beware Villaragiosa's Solar Ballot Bamboozle (NO on Measure B)

This article appears in the January issue of Boulevard Sentinel newspaper. It is a summary of recent press regarding Antonio Villaraigosa's Measure B (Solar panels). I put this together to hopefully be something that sums things up for voters including quotes from LA Times, LA Weekly, RonKayeLA and includes the ballot measure argument that Antonio is suing over.
 
IF YOU LIKE THIS SUMMARY, PLEASE EMAIL IT TO ALL OF YOUR CONTACTS.
 
Thanks, Zuma Dogg
 
 
It may feel like we just got done counting votes in the last election; but the New Year means it is already crunch-time for the March 3, 2009 City of Los Angeles general election. 
 
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is up for re-election. And Zuma Dogg is challenging him, so look for my name on the ballot! 
 
Two other big (and very important) elecions are for City Attorney and City Controller. Villaraiogsa's puppet, City Councilmember Jack Weiss, is running for City Attorney. (Even other councilmembers have told Zuma Dogg that they hope he loses. So please look into the other candidates and vote for one of them.
 
In the City Controller's race, you have constituent-loathed City Councilmember "Wicked" Wendy Greuel. So please vote for someone else, in that one, too.
 
Because, can you imagine the nightmare that this city would become if Villaraigosa is re-elected, with Jack Weiss as his City Attorney and "Greuesom" Greuel as City Controller? Ask around. Most people I have spoken with, think the City would be a scary place with those three in charge. (You could have a corrupt mayor working in cahoots with the city attorney and the controller will play the role of Hellen Keller.)
 
Ron Kaye blogged on his RonKayeLA.com, "The March 3 primary gives us the chance to change L.A., to elect candidates to the City Controller's and City Attorney's offices who can stand for the community. Villaraigosa, Wendy Greuel and Jack Weiss along with the 15 obedient council members will have nothing in their way if they prevail in this election."
 
But it is Villaraiogosa newest ballot-measure-bamboozle (Measure B, solar power bond) that has already generated the most media coverage and community discussion among the activists.
 
The avalanche of bad press on Measure B was triggered by an LA Times article that called attention to the "risky" nature of this half-cocked boondoggle that requires the blind public trust of the DWP and the City's blank check spending. Plus, LA Times reports that City Council President Eric Garcetti withheld an important report on the matter from other councilmembers, and more importantly, from the public.
 
And now, Ron Kaye informed the City through his blog, "Please be aware that the mayor's lawyer has dragged Jack Humphreville, me (Ron Kaye) and others who signed the "No on Prop. B" (opposition) ballot argument into to court today, challenging our statements. This is being done even as the L.A. Times reveals today that a critical report exposing this solar energy plan as costly and "extremely risky" was being kept secret from City Council members and the public even as the measure was being rushed to the ballot. The mayor's lawyer is demanding opponents pay court costs and legal fees when we don't even have a lawyer."
 
Zuma Dogg would like to remind you that this is not only a retaliatory move, but a scare tactic to try and prevent people from stepping up to write the opposition to the mayor's shady ballot measures and propositions. (And did you notice that Villaraigosa's City Hall just pulled the plug on the Time-Warner public access channel, just in time for election season?) Anything to silence public opposition.
 
Ron Kaye adds, "This isn't just an attempt to squelch the Solar Eight or the debate over this phony ballot measure but a direct assault on everyones' right to freedom of speech and to participate in the political and electoral process. We need support from Neighborhood Councils, homeowner and resident groups, service clubs, churches and every individual who cares about L.A. This is a defining moment. We need to come together and stop the political machine that is destroying the city. If we won't fight as one against these tactics and this dirty deal, I don't know that we ever will."
  

LA Weekly's Jill Stewart wrote in the most recent issue, "In short, City Hall and Villaraigosa have no idea how they are going to pull off the most massive, experimental, costly installation of solar panels ever attempted in the United States. It will require Angelenos to pour huge sums of their own money into Chinese solar-panel factories. Measure B wants the money from city taxpayers first with virtually no strings. The solar plan has the makings of yet another flubbed Villaraigosa dramaturgy."

 
LA Times' David Zahniser reports, "What they didn't discuss was an analysis by a city-hired consulting firm that called the solar plan 'extremely risky' and considerably more expensive than was being portrayed by the Department of Water and Power."
 
Adding, "Measure B, which calls for unionized DWP workers to install solar panels on rooftops and parking lots across the city, sailed onto the ballot with a unanimous vote. But days earlier, the council's top policy advisor was so troubled by the proposal that, in an e-mail to Council President Eric Garcetti, he recommended that the council delay it until a future election. Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller warned Garcetti that the solar measure could result in "substantial increases" to the electricity bills of DWP customers. Neither Miller nor Garcetti made those findings part of the public record. Bottom line is they do not believe that the department can deliver on this program at all, and that the costs associated with the program are way understated,' Miller wrote in his e-mail to Garcetti."
 
Here is the opposition ballot argument to Measure B (Solar) that the shady, vindictive mayor is challenging:
 
There is a more efficient way to produce more solar power AND at a lower cost using better technology - but if Prop B passes - the City will be forced to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on outdated technology that benefits no one but the people who paid to put this on the ballot.
 
This multi-billion dollar plan was placed on the ballot at the last minute as the result of City Hall back room dealings. There were no public hearings and no engineering and operational input from DWP. The Council did not consider the impact on Ratepayers, the overall cost of this massive project, or the impact on the already burdened infrastructure. Our rates were just raised 24%! It is just another one of these tricky deals that says it's about solar energy and workforce development. The LA Times wrote, "This rush to the ballot has the scent of swindle about it." Don't be fooled by City Hall. Demand honesty and transparency.
 

Measure B and Antonio Villaraigosa's lawsuit against the authors of the opposition ballot argument, highlights the whole kit and caboodle of ballot bamboozlement.

 
The mayor KNOWS this will slip by un-informed, mis-led voters. (They says it's for one thing, then ends up being something else.) Unfortunately, it is you who ends up paying for all of this wasteful. experimental and irresponsible non-sense.
 
This is why I hope you join me and many other people from across the city to help clean up city hall. It needs more than a sweep...it needs sweeping changes.
 
It will take the efforts of almost everyone reading this; along with all the activists on the blogs who lead the information charge and get the word out to the public.
 
PLEASE JOIN THE PEOPLE WHO ARE EMAILING ALERTS ABOUT THE MARCH 3, 2009 ELECTION, relating to the many city positions, and especially Measure B. Stop the City Hall shell game being run by the mayor and city council. Let's keep the risky gambling inside casinos and out of City Hall.
 
Get out the word, to get out and vote. If you go to LADailyBlog.com, you can find specific articles regarding the March election , ready for you to email blast to your contacts.
 
Zuma Dogg
 
(213) 785-7272
 
P.O. Box 50616
L.A., CA 90050

Friday, January 2, 2009

BREAKING NEWS ALERT: Zuma Dogg To Appear on ABC News NIGHTLINE, Friday, January 9, 2009

Los Angeles candidate for mayor, Zuma Dogg, will be appearing on ABC News NIGHTLINE on Friday, January 9, 2009 at 11:35 pm on the ABC television network. Even if you are out of town, you will be able to see it anywhere in the country, or around the world. So, Zuma Dogg is going national and international with the shadiness that's going down inside Los Angeles City Hall under Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Los Angeles City Council.

Hey Villaraiogsa and City Council...how did that illegal and unconstitutional Venice Beach ordinance, overturned by a Federal judge that banned the sale of incense and Zuma Dogg tshirts work out for you, losers? The fact that your ordinance was overturned, means you never should have passed it in the first place. Which means Zuma Dogg never even should have been to City Hall, even once. AND NOW LOOK YOU DUMB A-HOLE, LOSERAIGOSA AND SHITTY COUNCIL!!!

ZUMA DOGG IS ON THE BALLOT FOR MAYOR AND NOW ON THE HEELS OF THE LA WEEKLY ARTICLE YOU JUST GOT DONE READING, YOU CAN WATCH ZUMA DOGG ON ABC NEWS NIGHTLINE, FRIDAY, JANUARY 9, 2009 at 11:35 pm, you dumb a-holes.

TRY VIOLATING MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AGAIN, LOSERS AND WATCH IT BACKFIRE IN THE MEDIA, EVEN MORE.

YOU DON'T THINK THERE IS GOING TO BE A RUN-OFF???

What are you going to do wrong next, you dumb loser Villaraigosa? You have really surrounded yourself with some sharp folks. They done real well for you. Gadfly Zuma Dogg is "the biggest challenger" according to LA Weekly, and that's before Nightlight. LOL!

THE MAYOR WANTS TO RUN THE CITY??? HE CAN'T EVEN RUN THIS CHRISTMAS TREE
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z_O3HItIWbU&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/z_O3HItIWbU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

ZumaDoggForMayor.com

A MESSAGE FROM RON KAYE Regarding This Saturday (Solar Measure B)

Everyone:

I'm sure everyone knows about the lawsuit against the "Solar 8" over the Prop. B ballot arguments. I'll be talking about the measure and the legal issues to the L.A. Neighborhood Council Coalition meeting on Saturday at the Hollywood City Hall, 6501 Fountain Ave. and those who are interested in being involved can hang out after the LANCC for an informal meeting of the Saving L.A. Project to discuss strategy for the March 3 election.

This is a great opportunity for us to help make a difference. The way City Hall is treating the community has reached a level of arrogance that is bringing people together from all over the city to work for change.

The LANCC meetings starts at 10 a.m. and I'm supposed to speak along with others about 12:30 p.m. so we should be able to hold our meeting about 2 p.m. or so. It's really just to bat ideas around about strategy and tactics and organizing various groups to get involved.

I've been writing a lot about the solar issue on my blog if you want to read in:
http://ronkayela.com/2008/12/the-solar-8-our-legal-defense.html

Many of the court documents and other material are available in those articles.

We're going to need to raise funds for the legal case and the campaign. The DWP Committee led by Soledad Garcia has set up a bank account to receive donations and the money is being handled by SLAP President Heinrich Keifer.

Send checks to "DWP Committee for advocacy," c/o of Secretary/ Treasurer Heinrich Keifer, 5669 York Blvd., Los Angeles CA 90042

All donations are welcome and most importantly help get the word out to other groups you're involved with.

This solar plan is a fraud. It's not about bringing solar energy to L.A., which gets less than 1 percent of its electricity from the sun because the DWP and its union, the IBEW Local 18, have blocked development of solar energy. Prop. B is nothing but a payoff to the union so we can move forward with green power -- something we all want to see -- but the cost is too high and there's utterly no planning or studies to justify.

Even beyond that, the process of rushing this measure through the City Council in just three week with little or no serious public discussion, excluding Neighborhood Councils and the DWP Commission and keeping critical information secret says a lot about just how bad this measure is.

We owe a huge debt of gratitude to City Attorney candidate Noel Weiss for stepping forward last Saturday to give us legal help in responding to the lawsuit.

Happy New Year to everyone, it's going to be an exciting roller-coaster ride.

Best, Ron

Friday, December 19, 2008

NEW: Welcome to LOS ANGELES VOTERS FOR CHANGE (March 3, 2009 Election Slate)

Please go to http://lavotersforchange.com/. We hope you join us in promoting this slate of candidates and ballot positions in the March 3, 2009 City of Los Angeles general election.

The Power of LA Voters For Change

We The People of Los Angeles, have a chance to create some real change at City Hall during the March 3, 2009 general election where Antonio Villaraigosa is up for re-election, several Los Angeles city council and LAUSD board member seats are on the ballot; along with numerous ballot measures.

Last mayoral election, no one had heard of YouTube or MySpace. Most of us had never even heard of a "blog", let alone read one. And although many of you had email accounts, this election cycle, EVERYONE has an email account and list of email address contacts.

WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO START MAKING MUCH MORE OF AN IMPACT IN THIS NEW TECHNOLOGICAL ERA!

Holding group meetings are important, too. But Los Angeles is such a big area, no matter what location you choose, it is inconvenient for most of the people to attend. And it's tough to get everyone in the room at the same time on the same day.
LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE has put together a blog where we will post videos from candidates, news articles and blog posts that help support some of the reasons we need change in 2009. The first article features the Los Angeles Times coverage of Measure B (Solar Energy Bond). LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE takes a "NO" position on Measure B, so we posted the article for all to see.

You can also see the slate of LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE endorsed candidates and ballot positions. Go to http://lavotersforchange.com/.

We hope the blog is a focal point that you can use to help promote the kind of change that LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE will be pushing for in the upcoming elections.

THE ENTIRE EFFORT IS BASED AROUND HAVING YOU EMAIL THE BLOG ADDRESS (http://lavotersforchange.com/) TO EVERYONE IN YOUR EMAIL CONTACTS IF YOU SUPPORT THE SLATE OF CANDIDATES WE HAVE ASSEMBLED.

AND FINALLY, you can read the LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE petition that will describe why we need change at LA City Hall. CLICK HERE to read the petition.

If you have anything you would like to see added or addressed send an email to info@LAVotersForChange.com.

L.A. Voters For Change -- March 2009 Election Slate (City of Los Angeles)

* Mayor: David Saltsburg (Aka: Zuma Dogg) ANYONE BUT ANTONIO!

* City Attorney: NOEL Weiss or Carmen Trutanich (NO Jack Weiss)

* City Controller: Nick Patsouras

* Council District 1: Jesse Rosas

* Council District 3: Dennis P. Zine (Incumbent)

* Council District 5: David T. Vahedi

* Council District 7: Incumbent running un-opposed.

* Council District 9: Incumbent running un-opposed.

* Council District 11: To Be Announced

* Council District 13: To Be Announced

* Council District 15: To Be Announced

* LAUSD District 6: Louis Puglise

* LAUSD Distritct 4: To Be Announced Announced

* Ballot Measure: NO on "B" (Solar Energy Boondoggle)

NOTE: In the City Attorney election, both candidates mentioned have support with LA Voters For Change. Look into NOEL Weiss and Carmen Trutanich and vote ONLY for one of the two. (NOT Jack Weiss.)

LA Voters For Change.com

Los Angeles Times Exposes Measure B (Solar Energy Bond) As "Extremely Risky" While Council President Eric Garcetti Witholds Information From Public

Analysis calls ambitious L.A. solar plan 'extremely risky'

An outside consultant says Measure B, which easily made the March 3 ballot, is more costly than portrayed by the city's Department of Water and Power.

By David Zahniser

December 19, 2008

When members of the Los Angeles City Council agreed last month to put an ambitious solar energy plan on the March 3 ballot, they talked effusively about their desire for cleaner air and "green" technology jobs -- the kind that could boost the economy during a recession.

What they didn't discuss was an analysis by a city-hired consulting firm that called the solar plan "extremely risky" and considerably more expensive than was being portrayed by the Department of Water and Power.

Measure B, which calls for unionized DWP workers to install solar panels on rooftops and parking lots across the city, sailed onto the ballot with a unanimous vote. But days earlier, the council's top policy advisor was so troubled by the proposal that, in an e-mail to Council President Eric Garcetti, he recommended that the council delay it until a future election.

After receiving the analysis from the consulting firm, Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller warned Garcetti that the solar measure could result in "substantial increases" to the electricity bills of DWP customers.

Neither Miller nor Garcetti made those findings part of the public record. Since then, Miller's office has rebuffed requests from The Times for a copy of the consulting firm's analysis, saying the state's public records law allows city officials to withhold any document that would reveal the "deliberative process" between the council and its chief legislative analyst.

Miller said Thursday he is no longer worried about the cost, as long as the DWP can secure $1.5 billion in solar tax credits. But he said the agency still must deal with other findings from the consultant, which concluded that the utility "does not have the planning mechanisms and resources in place" to accomplish the solar plan.

Opponents have called Measure B a backdoor mechanism to make voters sign off on a huge package of DWP rate increases. And they accused Garcetti and Miller of concealing the findings of the private analysts, P.A. Consulting Group.

"That's the problem with City Hall," said former DWP Commission President Nick Patsaouras who opposes Measure B and is running for city controller. "They think the average taxpayer is not smart enough to tell them the truth."

[Nick Patsaouras is running against LA City Councilmember Wendy Greuel for the position of City Controll in the March 3, 2009 general election. See Greuel's comments below. LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE strongly endorses Nick Patsaouras for City Controller.]

In a Nov. 4 e-mail obtained by The Times, (Miller wrote,) "It concerns me greatly that the department did not come forward with this information themselves. It would have been as available to them as it was to me."

Garcetti said he later gave Miller permission to give the findings to other council members -- and would not have voted to place the measure on the ballot if he thought the findings were accurate.

[LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE would like to remind Mr. Garcetti that it is not up to him to make that final decision for all other Councilmembers. LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE would like to remind Council President Garcetti that he is working in a democratic, not autocratic system.]

Still, Councilman Bernard C. Parks, who heads the council's Budget and Finance Committee, said he never received the findings -- and wished that he had.

"If this is accurate information, or at least a point of view, the council should get the chance to ferret through this," Parks said.

The DWP has already agreed to impose increases of nearly 24% on electricity bills between 2006 and 2010. DWP officials contend the solar plan would lead to rate hikes of no more than 4% for the average household, and that those would occur no sooner than 2011.

But according to a one-page summary attached to Miller's e-mail, P.A. Consulting Group warned that ratepayers could face annual surcharges of up to 12% per year if Measure B passes.

The analysis also said that the solar plan would cost $3.6 billion, not the $1.5 billion suggested by DWP General Manager H. David Nahai.

"Bottom line is they do not believe that the department can deliver on this program at all, and that the costs associated with the program are way understated," Miller wrote in his e-mail to Garcetti.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and council members have embraced the solar plan, which was spearheaded by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the union that represents DWP employees. Under the plan, all the solar panels would be owned by the DWP and installed by the utility's workers.

Councilwoman Jan Perry, who heads the Energy and Environment Committee, said Miller showed her the one-page summary of the consulting firm's findings. Perry said she was "alarmed" by the potential effect on DWP ratepayers but did not keep the document because she thought it was confidential.

Greuel, who is also running for city controller, said she also looked at Miller's document but concluded that the DWP had answered all the questions raised by it.

[Is that they type of response you want to hear from someone running for City Controller? Enough blind-eyes inside city council chambers: LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE ENDORSE NICK PATSAOURAS FOR LOS ANGELES CITY CONTROLLER.]

The firm warned that (a DWP) surcharge, which stands at 4% annually, could triple if Measure B passes.

DWP officials said they had not received a copy of the outside analysis. But in an interview two weeks ago, Nahai said the prospect for a larger surcharge was unlikely.

[DWP officials were o.k. with putting something of this magnatude on the ballot, without reading the report? I guess it didn't matter what the report said, they are doing this, no matter what the cost to city ratepayers.]

SAY NO TO VILLARAIOGOSA'S SOLAR ENERGY BOONDOGGLE (make that BONDoggle)!

LA VOTERS FOR CHANGE URGE YOU TO VOTE "NO to Measure B!"

"Is that within the realm of political possibility? I would say no."

Original LA Times Post

Email: info@LAVotersForChange.com
LA Voters For Change.com

Thursday, December 18, 2008

L.A. Voters For Change - Candidate Slate (March 3, 2009 General Election, City of Los Angeles)

  • Mayor: David Saltsburg (Aka: Zuma Dogg)
  • City Attorney: Noel Weiss, Carmen Trutanich
  • City Controller: Nick Patsouras
  • Council District 1: Jesse Rosas
  • Council District 3: Dennis P. Zine
  • Council District 5: David T. Vahedi
  • Council District 7: Richard Alarcon is running un-opposed.
  • Council District 9: Jan Perry is running un-opposed.
  • Council District 11: To Be Announced
  • Council District 13: To Be Announced
  • Council District 15: To Be Announced
  • LAUSD District 6: Louis Puglise
  • Ballot Prop: NO on B (DWP)
NOTE: In the City Attorney election, both candidates mentioned have support with LA Voters For Change. Look into NOEL Weiss and Carmen Trutanich and vote ONLY for one of the two. (NOT Jack Weiss.)

Click here for the "LA Voters For Change" Petition